Wildcat: Educational RISC-V Microprocessors
Abstract
The paper "Wildcat" challenges the traditional 5-stage pipeline model used in computer architecture education by examining simpler RISC-V organizations for teaching and implementation. Analysis across FPGA and SkyWater130 ASIC designs revealed that longer pipelines (4 or 5 stages) often result in slower maximum clock frequencies than a 3-stage design. This counter-intuitive performance degradation is attributed to the increased width and complexity of the forwarding multiplexer, leading the author to recommend the 3-stage architecture for its pedagogical clarity and physical efficiency.
Report
Wildcat: Educational RISC-V Microprocessors Report
Key Highlights
- Educational Challenge: The paper addresses the reliance on the traditional, potentially suboptimal, five-stage pipeline for teaching computer architecture, proposing simpler alternatives.
- Empirical Finding: Contrary to common industry wisdom, implementing a longer pipeline (four or five stages) did not consistently increase the maximum clock frequency compared to a three-stage design in specific FPGA and ASIC implementations.
- Critical Path Identified: The performance bottleneck for longer pipelines was found to be the widening of the forwarding multiplexer within the execution stage, which limits the clock speed.
- Recommendation: The 3-stage pipeline organization is argued to be more adequate and effective for both teaching microprocessor organization and for efficient resource utilization in embedded hardware.
Technical Details
- Architecture Focus: Simplistic pipeline organizations for RISC processors, optimized for educational purposes and implementation in FPGAs and ASICs.
- Methodology: Resource costs and maximum clock frequency (used as a performance proxy) were analyzed for various pipeline lengths.
- Implementation Platforms: Designs were implemented and tested on commercial FPGAs. Results were validated through ASIC synthesis using the open-source SkyWater130 (Sky130) process.
- Observed Results: In two FPGA tests and one ASIC synthesis, the three-stage implementation demonstrated a faster clock frequency than the four- or five-stage implementations.
Implications
- Pedagogical Shift: The research provides strong evidence supporting the use of the 3-stage pipeline as the foundational model in computer architecture courses, offering a simpler representation of pipeline organization without sacrificing realism.
- Efficient RISC-V Implementation: For developers targeting low-cost, resource-constrained environments (like embedded FPGAs or basic ASICs using open-source processes like Sky130), this work suggests that optimizing for pipeline length beyond three stages may be counterproductive to achieving high clock speed.
- Hardware Design Principle: It emphasizes that the complexity of control logic (specifically forwarding mechanisms) can become the ultimate limiter of pipeline performance, overshadowing the benefits of increased stage parallelism, particularly in small core designs.
Technical Deep Dive Available
This public summary covers the essentials. The Full Report contains exclusive architectural diagrams, performance audits, and deep-dive technical analysis reserved for our members.